Foundations of Emergency Medicine: Impact of a Standardized, Open-access, Core Content Curriculum on In-Training Exam Scores.

Introduction: Learners frequently benefit from modalities such as small-group, case-based teaching and interactive didactic experiences rather than passive learning methods. These contemporary techniques are features of Foundations of Emergency Medicine (FoEM) curricula, and particularly the Foundations I (F1) course, which targets first-year resident (PGY-1) learners. The American Board of Emergency Medicine administers the in-training exam (ITE) that provides an annual assessment of EM-specific medical knowledge. We sought to assess the effect of F1 implementation on ITE scores. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from interns at four EM residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. We collected data in 2021. Participating sites were geographically diverse and included three- and four-year training formats. We collected data from interns two years before (control group) and two years after (intervention group) implementation of F1 at each site. Year of F1 implementation ranged from 2015-2018 at participating sites. We abstracted data using a standard form including program, ITE raw score, year of ITE administration, US Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 score, Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score, and gender. We performed univariable and multivariable linear regression to explore differences between intervention and control groups. Results: We collected data for 180 PGY-1s. Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores were significant predictors of ITE in univariable analyses (both with P < 0.001). After accounting for Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores, we did not find F1 implementation to be a significant predictor of ITE score, P = 0.83. Conclusion: Implementation of F1 curricula did not show significant changes in performance on the ITE after controlling for important variables.

Clinicians' Insights on Emergency Department Boarding: An Explanatory Mixed Methods Study Evaluating Patient Care and Clinician Well-Being.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe clinicians' insights into the quality and safety of patient care delivered to emergency department (ED) boarding patients, as well as clinician safety and satisfaction related to ED boarding. METHODS: This was a single-site, mixed methods sequential explanatory study. Quantitative data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey sent to ED attending physicians, resident physicians, advanced practice providers, and nurses. Semistructured focus group interviews with a subsample of participants sought to add depth to the interpretation of survey data and identify areas of improvement in boarding care. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to evaluate for response differences between groups. Qualitative data were thematically coded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 94 questionnaires were obtained for a response rate of 34.1%. Clinicians reported that boarding highly contributed to the perception of burnout. All groups reported high rates of perceived verbal and/or physical abuse from boarding patients (86.8% of nurses, 41.1% of providers, p = 0.0002). A total of 39 clinicians participated in focus groups regarding boarding care, and six themes were identified, including patient safety concerns, lack of knowledge/resources/training, and poor communication. Key themes identified as possible solutions to improve care included standardization of care, proactive planning, and culture change. CONCLUSION: Clinicians identified many concerns regarding patient safety and the quality of care delivered to boarding patients and identified several areas for improvement. Clinicians also felt that boarding negatively affected their satisfaction and safety.

Implementation of a standardized pregnancy screening process to address gender disparities in radiology turn-around-time and ED length of stay.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this initiative was to quantify and intervene upon suspected gender disparities in CT turn-around-time and emergency department (ED) length of stay. METHODS: This was a single-site before-after quality improvement initiative including patients aged 12-50 who underwent CT chest and/or abdomen/pelvis. The intervention included protocolization of the pregnancy screening process in triage. Primary outcomes included the difference between women of childbearing age and similarly aged men in regards to CT turn-around-time and ED length of stay. Pre- and post-intervention data were analyzed, including an "intensive intervention period" subanalysis. RESULTS: CT turn-around-time for women of childbearing age was 19 min longer than for similarly aged men at baseline and did not change significantly post-intervention. ED length of stay was 27 min longer for women of childbearing age compared to similarly aged men at baseline and 7 min longer post-intervention, although this was still a significant difference. During the intensive intervention period, CT turn-around-time for women of childbearing age was 15 min longer than similarly aged men but the difference in ED length of stay of 10 min was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: There is gender disparity in CT turn-around-time and ED length of stay in our ED, highlighting an important area for improvement to promote equitable care. A quality improvement initiative that aimed to protocolize pregnancy testing in triage did not show sustainable improvement in these outcomes but did result in increased pregnancy testing.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'objectif de cette initiative était de quantifier et d'intervenir sur les disparités présumées entre les sexes dans le délai d'exécution du scanner et la durée du séjour au service des urgences. MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une initiative d'amélioration de la qualité à un seul site avant-après, incluant les patients âgés de 12 à 50 ans qui ont subi une TDM thoracique et/ou abdominale/bassin. L'intervention comprenait la protocolisation du processus de dépistage de la grossesse lors du triage. Les résultats primaires comprenaient la différence entre les femmes en âge de procréer et les hommes du même âge en ce qui concerne le délai d'exécution du scanner et la durée du séjour aux urgences. Les données avant et après l'intervention ont été analysées, y compris une sous-analyse de la "période d'intervention intensive". RéSULTATS: Le temps d'exécution de la TDM chez les femmes en âge de procréer était 19 minutes de plus que chez les hommes de même âge au départ et n'a pas changé de façon significative après l'intervention. La durée de séjour aux urgences était de 27 minutes de plus pour les femmes en âge de procréer par rapport aux hommes du même âge au départ et de 7 minutes de plus après l'intervention, bien que cette différence reste significative. Au cours de la période d'intervention intensive, le temps de passage au scanner des femmes en âge de procréer était de 15 minutes plus long que celui des hommes du même âge, mais la différence de 10 minutes dans la durée de séjour aux urgences n'était plus significative. CONCLUSIONS: Il existe une disparité entre les sexes en ce qui concerne le délai d'exécution du scanner et la durée de séjour dans nos urgences, ce qui met en évidence un domaine important à améliorer pour promouvoir des soins équitables. Une initiative d'amélioration de la qualité visant à protocoliser le test de grossesse au triage n'a pas montré d'amélioration durable de ces résultats mais a entraîné une augmentation des tests de grossesse.